| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-22 | Oshawa Generals | OHL | 59 | 9 | 5 | 14 | 0.237 | 0.1373 | 0.1491 | 0.6088 | 0.6609 |
| 2022-23 | Oshawa Generals | OHL | 48 | 8 | 5 | 13 | 0.271 | 0.1567 | 0.1633 | 0.6947 | 0.7241 |
| 2023-24 | Oshawa Generals | OHL | 63 | 30 | 21 | 51 | 0.809 | 0.4683 | 0.4657 | 2.0767 | 2.0652 |
| 2024-25 | Oshawa Generals | OHL | 67 | 13 | 22 | 35 | 0.522 | 0.3022 | 0.2849 | 1.3402 | 1.2636 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | RPI | D1 | ECAC | — | 34 | 5 | 7 | 12 | 0.353 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.