IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Wyatt Versfelt Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2007-03-01 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Perth-Andover Bearcats USPHL-Premier 7 0 2 2 0.286 0.0942 0.1005 0.0972 0.1037
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 RIT ACHA_D1 — — 0 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 RIT ACHA_D1 — — 0 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 RIT ACHA_D1 — — 0 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 RIT ACHA_D1 — — 0 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 RIT ACHA_D1 — — 0 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 RIT ACHA_D1 — — 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
72%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

D1 Comparables

Steven Santini
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Boston College (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Christian Wolanin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Trevor Hamilton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Miami (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Alex Smith
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Josh Couturier
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Boston College (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jordan Stear
Lebanon Valley · 2018-19
0.130 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Trevor Veneklase
SUNY Cortland · 2015-16
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Steve Cornelissen
SUNY Potsdam · 2003-04
0.435 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.