IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Garrett Joss Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-03-12 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Stouffville Spirit OJHL 6 1 1 2 0.333 0.0817 0.0867 0.2295 0.2434
2022-23 Smiths Falls Bears CCHL 49 11 10 21 0.429 0.0930 0.0947 0.3316 0.3375
2023-24 Utah Outliers NCDC 53 19 42 61 1.151 0.4692 0.4616 0.9251 0.9102
2024-25 Utah Outliers NCDC 48 37 17 54 1.125 0.4587 0.4309 0.9043 0.8495
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC FR 16 2 3 5 0.312
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.38
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.31
2025-26 · Gustavus Adolphus
-17.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

42%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4476
Forward overall
#107
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Carlos Amestoy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
Todd Skirving
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Shane Sooth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brad Carpenter
Wentworth · 2000-01
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Henry McKinney
Nazareth · 2018-19
0.536 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Owen Sikich
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2017-18
0.630 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.