IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Scott Savage Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1995-04-11 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 U.S. National U17 Team NTDP-U18 44 2 8 10 0.227 0.1762 0.1805 0.8460 0.8668
2012-13 — NTDP-U18 60 3 7 10 0.167 0.1293 0.1257 0.6204 0.6032
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Boston College D1 HockeyEast — 40 5 24 29 0.725
2015-16 Boston College D1 HockeyEast — 41 1 17 18 0.439
2014-15 Boston College D1 HockeyEast — 38 0 6 6 0.158
2013-14 Boston College D1 HockeyEast — 35 4 14 18 0.514
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.51
2013-14 · Boston College
+268.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#16274
Defenseman overall
#1959
Defenseman born in 1995

D1 Comparables

Tyler Dorantes
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Gage Ausmus
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Trevor Hamilton
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ Miami (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Christian Wolanin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Steven Santini
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Boston College (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Pat Power
Wisconsin-Superior · 2001-02
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Fea
Wilkes · 2014-15
1.208 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Raphael Robitaille
Norwich · 2002-03
1.240 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.