IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Gage Ausmus Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1995-04-22 Country: USA
2013 · Round 5, Pick #151  ·  San Jose Sharks San Jose Sharks
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 U.S. National U17 Team NTDP-U18 54 2 4 6 0.111 0.0826 0.0848 0.4146 0.4254
2012-13 U.S. National U18 Team NTDP-U18 66 2 12 14 0.212 0.1577 0.1536 0.7914 0.7707
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 North Dakota D1 NCHC SR 38 2 7 9 0.237
2015-16 North Dakota D1 NCHC JR 42 0 11 11 0.262
2014-15 North Dakota D1 NCHC SO 42 2 4 6 0.143
2013-14 North Dakota D1 NCHC FR 21 2 1 3 0.143
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.14
2013-14 · North Dakota
+20.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#12293
Defenseman overall
#1645
Defenseman born in 1995

D1 Comparables

Scott Savage
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Boston College (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Dorantes
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Jimmy Schuldt
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.63 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Connor Clifton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Trevor Hamilton
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ Miami (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brogan Shea
UMass Dartmouth · 2021-22
0.385 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Justin Fox
Salem State · 2004-05
1.429 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Patrick Stillar
SUNY Morrisville · 2008-09
1.154 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.