IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brogan Shea Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-02-12 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Philadelphia Hockey Club NCDC 5 2 3 5 1.000 0.4077 0.4397 0.8038 0.8670
2022-23 — NCDC 20 0 8 8 0.400 0.1631 0.1691 1.0555 1.0903
2023-24 Boston Dogs EHL 32 4 10 14 0.438 0.1011 0.1011 0.2141 0.2142
2024-25 WB/Scranton Knights NCDC 20 2 5 7 0.350 0.1427 0.1335 0.2813 0.2632
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 UMass Dartmouth D3 HockeyEast FR 13 2 3 5 0.385
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.38
2025-26 · UMass Dartmouth
+272.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
2%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#34187
Forward overall
#2072
Forward born in 2004
#1210
in NCDC

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Evan Wammes
Fredonia · 2022-23
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Justin Miller
Nazareth · 2017-18
0.565 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jeremy Solat
SUNY Brockport · 2016-17
0.385 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.