← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jeremy Solat Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-02-21 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Bay State Breakers USPHL-Premier-Classic 44 7 14 21 0.477 0.1433 0.1496 0.3932 0.4104
2015-16 Islanders Hockey Club USPHL-Premier-Classic 36 3 9 12 0.333 0.1001 0.0996 0.2745 0.2731
2016-17 Utica Jr. Comets USPHL-Premier-Classic 45 9 22 31 0.689 0.2069 0.1957 0.5674 0.5368
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 SUNY Brockport D3 SO 25 8 7 15 0.600
2018-19 SUNY Brockport D3 FR 26 5 5 10 0.385
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.38
2018-19 · SUNY Brockport
+185.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#26235
Forward overall
#1116
Forward born in 1996
#144
in USPHL-Premier-Classic

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Manhattanville · 2014-15
0.739 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
UMass Boston · 2022-23
0.467 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
New England College · 2015-16
1.115 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.