IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jack Mortson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-02-27 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Soo Eagles NOJHL 0 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2021-22 Soo Eagles NOJHL 39 15 26 41 1.051 0.1772 0.1689 0.4368 0.4163
2022-23 Soo Eagles NOJHL 58 32 35 67 1.155 0.1948 0.1773 0.4800 0.4369
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 UMass Boston D3 — JR 27 10 15 25 0.926
2024-25 UMass Boston D3 NEHC SO 24 11 11 22 0.917
2023-24 UMass Boston D3 NEHC FR 15 4 3 7 0.467
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.47
2023-24 · UMass Boston
+213.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D1
28%
NCAA D2/D3
65%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#21822
Forward overall
#871
Forward born in 2002
#116
in NOJHL

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ricky DeRosa
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Aidan Cavallini
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Gavin Bloder
Fredonia · 2023-24
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Aaron Ryback
Concordia · 2015-16
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Evan Hesse
Augsburg · 2013-14
0.577 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.