IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Evan Hesse Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-03-05 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Alaska Avalanche NAHL 58 6 9 15 0.259 0.0950 0.1024 0.2733 0.2945
2011-12 Alaska Avalanche NAHL 34 8 17 25 0.735 0.2701 0.2778 0.7771 0.7992
2012-13 — NAHL 55 16 25 41 0.746 0.2739 0.2679 0.7879 0.7707
2013-14 St. Cloud Norsemen NAHL 58 16 28 44 0.759 0.2787 0.2586 0.8018 0.7441
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Augsburg D3 MIAC SR 24 1 7 8 0.333
2016-17 Augsburg D3 MIAC JR 28 5 11 16 0.571
2015-16 Augsburg D3 MIAC SO 22 1 4 5 0.227
2014-15 Augsburg D3 MIAC FR 26 2 13 15 0.577
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.22
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.58
2014-15 · Augsburg
+157.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#16282
Forward overall
#564
Forward born in 1993
#848
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ben Kemp
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2001-02
0.536 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Samuel Lozinski
Albertus Magnus · 2024-25
0.706 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Matthew Monreal
Southern New Hampshire · 2018-19
0.450 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.