IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Adam Cardwell Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1987-07-08 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2004-05 Indiana Ice USHL 27 1 4 5 0.185 0.1092 0.1169 0.5545 0.5937
2005-06 Wichita Falls Wildcats NAHL 58 15 27 42 0.724 0.2573 0.2660 0.7638 0.7897
2006-07 Wichita Falls Wildcats NAHL 62 19 37 56 0.903 0.3209 0.3160 0.9527 0.9381
2007-08 Wichita Falls Wildcats NAHL 56 32 59 91 1.625 0.5774 0.5402 1.7140 1.6035
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 BigTen SR 28 16 11 27 0.964
2011-12 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 BigTen JR 25 8 14 22 0.880
2010-11 Alaska Fairbanks D1 WCHA — 0 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#6491
Forward overall
#239
Forward born in 1987

D1 Comparables

Michael Huntebrinker
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.51 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Mike Szmatula
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.21 PPG
→ Northeastern (1.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.68 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Wahlin
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.33 PPG
→ UMass (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tim Bonner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.89 PPG
→ Yale
0.50 No data
NCAAe PPG
Eric Scheid
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.94 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.52 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Boyd Stahlbaum
Wisconsin-Stout · 2022-23
1.111 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Braden Desmet
Wisconsin-Superior · 2005-06
1.391 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Tanner Dalton
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.