IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Michael Haskins Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1995-09-12 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 South Shore Kings USPHL-Elite 36 0 9 9 0.250 0.0439 0.0440 0.0573 0.0574
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 RIT ACHA_D1 — — 20 14 6 20 1.000
2024-25 RIT ACHA_D1 — — 20 14 6 20 1.000
2023-24 RIT ACHA_D1 — — 20 14 6 20 1.000
2022-23 RIT ACHA_D1 — — 20 14 6 20 1.000
2021-22 RIT ACHA_D1 — — 20 14 6 20 1.000
2020-21 RIT ACHA_D1 — — 20 14 6 20 1.000
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.04
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.00
2020-21 · RIT
+2309.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#27147
Defenseman overall
#2710
Defenseman born in 1995
#1471
in USPHL-Elite

D1 Comparables

Joe Schuldt
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Michigan Tech
0.05 No data
NCAAe PPG
Neal Goff
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Mike Preston
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.07 PPG
→ Army (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Christian Neumann
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ UConn (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
James Roll
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Andrew Kurapov
Endicott · 2018-19
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Ram Sidhu
SUNY Geneseo · 2002-03
0.278 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Matteo DiBlasio
SUNY Morrisville · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.