IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Andrew Kurapov Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-09-09 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Islanders Hockey Club NCDC 35 1 2 3 0.086 0.0478 0.0479 0.0693 0.0695
2019-20 Thunder Hockey Club NCDC 50 22 39 61 1.220 0.6803 0.6803 0.9865 0.9865
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Endicott D3 CNE GR 28 14 14 28 1.000
2023-24 Endicott D3 CNE SR 28 11 20 31 1.107
2022-23 Endicott D3 CNE JR 27 13 18 31 1.148
2021-22 Endicott D3 CNE SO 27 13 13 26 0.963
2020-21 Endicott D1 — FR 3 0 2 2 0.667
2020-21 Endicott D3 CNE FR 3 0 2 2 0.667
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.04
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.67
2020-21 · Endicott
+1526.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
60%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#7930
Forward overall
#341
Forward born in 1999
#151
in NCDC

D1 Comparables

Conor Andrle
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Army (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Average
NCAAe PPG
Josh Erickson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ben Greiner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Hynes
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Union (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sebastian Weberg
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Colgate
0.14 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Todd Koritzinsky
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2012-13
0.550 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Will Fisher
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
0.143 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Collin McGuire
Nichols · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.