IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jack Barton Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-09-12 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Northern Cyclones EHL 12 1 2 3 0.250 0.0578 0.0585 0.1223 0.1238
2015-16 Northern Cyclones EHL 35 7 20 27 0.771 0.1782 0.1725 0.3774 0.3654
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Skidmore D3 SUNYAC — 17 0 0 0 0.000
2016-17 Skidmore D3 SUNYAC — 22 4 2 6 0.273
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.27
2016-17 · Skidmore
+151.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#29283
Forward overall
#1146
Forward born in 1995
#872
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Connor Nelson
Johnson & Wales · 2022-23
0.318 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Dennis Kubat
St. Scholastica · 2007-08
0.286 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Tim Crowley
SUNY Brockport · 2004-05
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.