IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jimmy Lombardi Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-02-16 Country: Canada
2025 · Round 4, Pick #125  ·  Los Angeles Kings Los Angeles Kings
Signed Professionally

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Flint Firebirds OHL 62 7 13 20 0.323 0.1866 0.2034 0.8447 0.9206
2024-25 Flint Firebirds OHL 63 13 32 45 0.714 0.4132 0.4290 1.8703 1.9418
2025-26 Flint Firebirds OHL 65 36 36 72 1.108 0.6408 0.6331 2.9004 2.8655
2026-27 Flint Firebirds OHL 5 2 8 10 2.000 1.1570 1.1570 5.2368 5.2368
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

🏒 NHL / Pro Track — production profile is consistent with players who bypassed or minimized college hockey
0%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
100%
NHL / Pro

NCAAe Rankings

D2/3 Comparables

Neil Trimm
Neumann · 2003-04
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Arkhip Ledenkov
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Brandon Osmundson
Utica · 2018-19
1.448 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.