IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brian Lee Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1987-03-26 Country: USA
2005 · Round 1, Pick #9  ·  Ottawa Senators Ottawa Senators
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2003-04 Billings Bulls NAHL 5 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2004-05 Lincoln Stars USHL 12 0 3 3 0.250 0.1475 0.1558 0.7509 0.7933
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2006-07 Lake Forest D3 NCHA JR 26 10 10 20 0.769
2005-06 Lake Forest D3 NCHA SO 28 9 9 18 0.643
2004-05 Lake Forest D3 NCHA FR 26 2 3 5 0.192

NCAAe Rankings

#10440
Defenseman overall
#1172
Defenseman born in 1987

D1 Comparables

Trevor Hamilton
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ Miami (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Steven Santini
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Boston College (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Josh Couturier
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Boston College (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Scott Savage
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Boston College (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Dorantes
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Matthew Grannan
Bethel · 2021-22
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Rusty Masters
Elmira · 2003-04
0.962 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Pier-Olivier Cotnoir
Norwich · 2006-07
0.808 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.