IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Pier-Olivier Cotnoir Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1989-05-27 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 Peterborough Liftlock Stars OJHL 48 26 21 47 0.979 0.2400 0.2535 0.6742 0.7121
2007-08 Peterborough Liftlock Stars OJHL 49 29 32 61 1.245 0.3051 0.3085 0.8571 0.8666
2008-09 Peterborough Liftlock Stars OJHL 42 19 48 67 1.595 0.3910 0.3753 1.0983 1.0541
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 Norwich D3 LittleEast SR 22 13 12 25 1.136
2011-12 Norwich D3 LittleEast JR 29 21 21 42 1.448
2010-11 Norwich D3 LittleEast SO 31 21 17 38 1.226
2009-10 Norwich D3 LittleEast FR 26 13 8 21 0.808
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.30
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.81
2009-10 · Norwich
+170.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#9123
Forward overall
#341
Forward born in 1989
#129
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Jay Dickman
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Bemidji State
0.36 No data
NCAAe PPG
John Simonson
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.97 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Robbie Payne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.12 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Brett Skibba
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ UConn (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Heinonen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.74 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jake Cox
Southern New Hampshire · 2016-17
0.808 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Andrew Morton
Curry · 2023-24
0.833 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Hunter Scanlon
UMass Dartmouth · 2022-23
0.611 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.