← New Search ↗ Social Card

Liam Beamish Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-01-04 Country: Canada
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Penn State
BigTen D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Niagara Falls Canucks OJHL 1 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 Sarnia Sting OHL 40 14 15 29 0.725 0.4194 0.4330 1.8629 1.9232
2025-26 Sarnia Sting OHL 66 11 22 33 0.500 0.2893 0.2841 1.2848 1.2617
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

40%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
18%
Age-Out / Club
38%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#16128
Forward overall
#449
Forward born in 2007

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.92 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.62 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.72 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Penn State Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

BCHL 2013-14
0.38
actual FR PPG at Penn State
USHL 2014-15
0.57
actual FR PPG at Penn State
USHL 2022-23
0.82
actual FR PPG at Penn State
USHL 2013-14
0.68
actual FR PPG at Penn State

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Morrisville · 2006-07
1.160 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Adrian · 2017-18
1.276 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stout · 2019-20
0.826 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.