IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jon Whitelaw Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1988-09-03 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2005-06 Huntsville Otters OJHL 43 17 9 26 0.605 0.1690 0.1808 0.4173 0.4465
2006-07 Huntsville Otters OJHL 47 18 26 44 0.936 0.2616 0.2668 0.6461 0.6589
2007-08 Huntsville Otters OJHL 49 24 35 59 1.204 0.3364 0.3279 0.8309 0.8098
2008-09 Huntsville Otters OJHL 49 40 39 79 1.612 0.4504 0.4159 1.1126 1.0273
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 SUNY Oswego D3 — SR 24 10 20 30 1.250
2011-12 SUNY Oswego D3 — JR 30 19 22 41 1.367
2010-11 SUNY Oswego D3 — SO 28 12 18 30 1.071
2009-10 SUNY Oswego D3 — FR 28 12 26 38 1.357
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.33
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.36
2009-10 · SUNY Oswego
+316.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#6516
Forward overall
#309
Forward born in 1988
#160
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

A.J. Reid
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.42 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jared VanWormer
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.27 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sean Gaffney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Beau Walker
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Sacred Heart (0.40 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Josh Cousineau
Adrian · 2009-10
0.773 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Mike Domsodi
Wentworth · 2010-11
1.250 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Austin Morgan
New England · 2017-18
0.714 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.