IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brooks Rogowski Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2008-06-28 Country: USA
2026 NHL Draft Eligible
Michigan State
BigTen D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Oshawa Generals OHL 66 11 12 23 0.348 0.2080 0.2301 0.9027 0.9988
2025-26 Oshawa Generals OHL 46 15 27 42 0.913 0.5449 0.5755 2.3649 2.4977
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
12%
Age-Out / Club
78%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5138
Forward overall
#70
Forward born in 2008
#639
in OHL

D1 Comparables

Gabe Guertler
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.85 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.57 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sean Malone
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.87 PPG
→ Harvard (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.58 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Matthew Weis
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.67 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Connor Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.49 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Trevor Moore
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.02 PPG
→ Denver (0.76 D1 FR PPG)
0.67 Strong
NCAAe PPG

Michigan State Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Josh Nodler
USHL 2018-19
0.22
actual FR PPG at Michigan State
Mitchell Mattson
USHS-MN 2014-15
0.00
actual FR PPG at Michigan State
Nicolas Müller
SHL-J20 2017-18
0.22
actual FR PPG at Michigan State
Patrick Khodorenko
NTDP-U18 2014-15
0.51
actual FR PPG at Michigan State

D2/3 Comparables

Nick Ford
Elmira · 2014-15
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Joseph Fiorino
Southern New Hampshire · 2016-17
0.593 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Reifler
Elmira · 2017-18
1.067 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.