IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brooks Rogowski Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2008-06-28 Country: USA
2026 · Round 2, Pick #33  ·  Vancouver Canucks Vancouver Canucks
Michigan State
BigTen D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Oshawa Generals OHL 66 11 12 23 0.348 0.2016 0.2231 0.9125 1.0096
2025-26 Oshawa Generals OHL 46 15 27 42 0.913 0.5282 0.5579 2.3906 2.5248
2026-27 Oshawa Generals OHL 5 0 4 4 0.800 0.4628 0.4628 2.0947 2.0947
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
20%
Age-Out / Club
57%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#9683
Forward overall
#113
Forward born in 2008
#487
in OHL

D1 Comparables

Justin Greenberg
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Miami (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Grant Besse
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jake Montgomery
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha
0.34 No data
NCAAe PPG
Drew Smolcynski
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.69 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Average
NCAAe PPG
John Stevens
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.81 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.59 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Strong
NCAAe PPG

Michigan State Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Nicolas Müller
SHL-J20 2017-18
0.22
actual FR PPG at Michigan State
Taro Hirose
BCHL 2014-15
0.71
actual FR PPG at Michigan State
Diego Johnson
USHL 2024-25
0.00
actual FR PPG at Michigan State
A.J. Hodges
USHL 2019-20
0.09
actual FR PPG at Michigan State

D2/3 Comparables

Ryan Cusin
UMass Boston · 2013-14
1.600 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Christopher Miraldo
Westfield State · 2021-22
1.037 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Patrick Stillar
SUNY Morrisville · 2010-11
1.154 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.