← New Search ↗ Social Card

Landon Wright Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-01-17 Country: Canada
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Maine
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Brockville Braves CCHL 11 1 1 2 0.182 0.0394 0.0455 0.1407 0.1625
2022-23 Brockville Braves CCHL 6 1 0 1 0.167 0.0362 0.0402 0.1290 0.1432
2023-24 Collingwood Blues OJHL 50 18 23 41 0.820 0.2010 0.2111 0.5646 0.5929
2024-25 Kingston Frontenacs OHL 25 3 2 5 0.200 0.1157 0.1139 0.5139 0.5058
2025-26 Kingston Frontenacs OHL 60 18 26 44 0.733 0.4242 0.3962 1.8842 1.7597
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
28%
Age-Out / Club
48%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#18225
Forward overall
#768
Forward born in 2006

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.48 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Maine Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NAHL 2015-16
0.00
actual FR PPG at Maine
BCHL 2023-24
0.29
actual FR PPG at Maine
USHL 2020-21
0.33
actual FR PPG at Maine
USHL 2016-17
0.68
actual FR PPG at Maine

D2/3 Comparables

Utica · 2012-13
1.296 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
UMass Boston · 2016-17
2.500 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Marian · 2010-11
1.038 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.