← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nolan Snyder Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2009-04-13 Country: USA
Top 80 — 2027 NHL Draft Prospect
Penn State
BigTen D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2025-26 Kingston Frontenacs OHL 68 16 17 33 0.485 0.2807 0.3076 1.2707 1.3923
2026-27 Kingston Frontenacs OHL 8 5 3 8 1.000 0.5785 0.5785 2.6184 2.6184
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Age-Out / Club
85%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#18159
Forward overall
#80
Forward born in 2009
#783
in OHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.87 PPG
→ Harvard (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.54 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.02 PPG
→ Denver (0.76 D1 FR PPG)
0.63 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.85 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.53 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.96 PPG
→ Michigan (0.89 D1 FR PPG)
0.69 Elite
NCAAe PPG
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Michigan (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Average
NCAAe PPG

Penn State Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

AJHL 2015-16
0.51
actual FR PPG at Penn State
OHL 2024-25
0.14
actual FR PPG at Penn State
USHL 2016-17
0.56
actual FR PPG at Penn State
USHL 2019-20
0.72
actual FR PPG at Penn State

D2/3 Comparables

Elmira · 2017-18
1.067 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Buffalo State · 2023-24
1.120 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Fitchburg State · 2016-17
1.429 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.