Cooper McAslan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2009-03-16 Country: Canada

Set Commitment

School

Type

Date (optional)

Detected conference: () — projections will update automatically.

Notes (optional)

Projecting as:

Show:

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory

Dashed = raw PPG · ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG · ■ Green = actual college PPG

Junior Seasons

Season	Team	League	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG	NCAAe-PPG	Age-Adj	D3e-PPG	Age-Adj
2025-26	London Knights	OHL	4	0	2	2	0.500	0.2893	0.3159	1.3092	1.4295
2026-27	London Knights	OHL	5	3	2	5	1.000	0.5785	0.5785	2.6184	2.6184

■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor) ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor) COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%

NCAA D1

NCAA D2/D3

82%

Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

D1 Comparables

Ian McCoshen

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.83 PPG

→ Boston College (0.37 D1 FR PPG)

0.52 Strong D

NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ryan Reifler

Elmira · 2017-18

1.067 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

Lucas Signoretti

Buffalo State · 2023-24

1.120 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

Sascha Figi

Fitchburg State · 2016-17

1.429 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.