icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
San Jose Sharks
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004-05 | Green Bay Gamblers | USHL | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | — | — | — | — |
| 2005-06 | Green Bay Gamblers | USHL | 59 | 2 | 11 | 13 | 0.220 | 0.1300 | 0.1298 | 0.6616 | 0.6603 |
| 2012-13 | Tappara | Liiga | 6 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.500 | 1.2500 | 1.3066 | 4.2980 | 4.4925 |
| 2023-24 | Straubing Tigers | DEL | 52 | 7 | 19 | 26 | 0.500 | 1.2500 | 0.7384 | 4.2391 | 2.5040 |
| 2024-25 | Straubing Tigers | DEL | 51 | 3 | 15 | 18 | 0.353 | 0.8822 | 0.4806 | 2.9920 | 1.6299 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009-10 | UMass | D1 | HockeyEast | SR | 36 | 8 | 23 | 31 | 0.861 |
| 2008-09 | UMass | D1 | HockeyEast | JR | 39 | 7 | 16 | 23 | 0.590 |
| 2007-08 | UMass | D1 | HockeyEast | SO | 36 | 4 | 16 | 20 | 0.556 |
| 2006-07 | UMass | D1 | HockeyEast | FR | 39 | 4 | 10 | 14 | 0.359 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.