IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Andy Miele Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1988-04-15 Country: USA
Signed Professionally
Fischtown Pinguins · DEL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2005-06 Cedar Rapids RoughRiders USHL 52 10 17 27 0.519 0.3192 0.3374 1.5297 1.6168
2006-07 — USHL 58 20 37 57 0.983 0.6041 0.6075 2.8955 2.9116
2007-08 Chicago Steel USHL 29 30 11 41 1.414 0.8691 0.8294 4.1653 3.9748
2017-18 — SHL 46 10 22 32 0.696 1.7392 1.4326 — —
2018-19 Torpedo Nizhny Novgorod KHL 61 16 16 32 0.525 1.3115 1.1026 — —
2020-21 Torpedo Nizhny Novgorod KHL 55 19 25 44 0.800 2.0000 2.0000 — —
2021-22 Torpedo Nizhny Novgorod KHL 47 13 23 36 0.766 1.9150 1.2955 — —
2022-23 HV71 SHL 51 12 24 36 0.706 1.7647 1.1061 — —
2023-24 Grizzlys Wolfsburg DEL 52 14 32 46 0.885 0.9674 0.6284 — —
2024-25 Grizzlys Wolfsburg DEL 52 16 16 32 0.615 0.6730 0.4062 — —
2025-26 Fischtown Pinguins DEL 51 7 22 29 0.569 0.6218 0.4045 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2010-11 Miami D1 CCHA-orig SR 39 24 47 71 1.821
2009-10 Miami D1 — JR 43 15 29 44 1.023
2008-09 Miami D1 — SO 41 15 16 31 0.756
2007-08 Miami D1 — FR 18 6 8 14 0.778
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.43
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.78
2007-08 · Miami
+81.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
95%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#2836
Forward overall
#119
Forward born in 1988

D2/3 Comparables

Neil Trimm
Neumann · 2003-04
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Arkhip Ledenkov
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Filimon Ledenkov
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.