| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005-06 | Omaha Lancers | USHL | 54 | 7 | 12 | 19 | 0.352 | 0.2076 | 0.2269 | 1.0569 | 1.1550 |
| 2006-07 | Omaha Lancers | USHL | 55 | 12 | 28 | 40 | 0.727 | 0.4290 | 0.4468 | 2.1844 | 2.2749 |
| 2007-08 | — | USHL | 35 | 5 | 12 | 17 | 0.486 | 0.2865 | 0.2837 | 1.4588 | 1.4445 |
| 2008-09 | Des Moines Buccaneers | USHL | 57 | 15 | 28 | 43 | 0.754 | 0.4450 | 0.4207 | 2.2658 | 2.1422 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012-13 | Vermont | D1 | HockeyEast | SR | 33 | 6 | 7 | 13 | 0.394 |
| 2011-12 | Vermont | D1 | HockeyEast | JR | 33 | 4 | 6 | 10 | 0.303 |
| 2010-11 | North Dakota | D1 | WCHA-orig | SO | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 |
| 2009-10 | North Dakota | D1 | NCHC | FR | 27 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 0.185 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.