IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nick Dineen Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1989-02-28 Country: USA
Signed Professionally
EC Bad Nauheim · DEL2

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2005-06 Sioux Falls Stampede USHL 53 6 11 17 0.321 0.1892 0.2082 0.9635 1.0604
2006-07 Sioux Falls Stampede USHL 60 14 24 38 0.633 0.3736 0.3920 1.9021 1.9957
2007-08 Sioux Falls Stampede USHL 58 26 28 54 0.931 0.5492 0.5481 2.7962 2.7905
2015-16 EC Bad Nauheim DEL2 52 19 42 61 1.173 1.5715 1.7285 2.1050 2.3152
2016-17 EC Bad Nauheim DEL2 52 17 22 39 0.750 1.0047 1.0422 1.3458 1.3960
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2011-12 Colorado College D1 WCHA-orig — 34 14 12 26 0.765
2010-11 Colorado College D1 WCHA-orig — 45 13 11 24 0.533
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.42
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.53
2010-11 · Colorado College
+28.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#7700
Forward overall
#289
Forward born in 1989

D2/3 Comparables

Ryan Bloom
University of New England · 2017-18
1.654 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Shaquille Merasty
Adrian · 2015-16
1.357 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Ben Blasko
Nazareth · 2017-18
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.