← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kyle Ross Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1986-09-12 Country: Canada
Signed Professionally
Univ. of Saskatchewan · USports-M

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2002-03 Red Deer Rebels WHL 9 0 3 3 0.333 0.1622 0.1810 0.8178 0.9128
2003-04 WHL 67 2 16 18 0.269 0.1307 0.1395 0.6593 0.7039
2004-05 Regina Pats WHL 72 10 30 40 0.556 0.2703 0.2741 1.3633 1.3826
2005-06 Regina Pats WHL 69 25 31 56 0.812 0.3948 0.3819 1.9914 1.9263
2006-07 Regina Pats WHL 71 20 48 68 0.958 0.4659 0.4269 2.3499 2.1532
2007-08 Univ. of Regina USports-M 28 8 12 20 0.714 0.3769 0.4056 2.0936 2.2531
2008-09 Univ. of Regina USports-M 26 8 12 20 0.769 0.4058 0.4151 2.2545 2.3064
2009-10 Univ. of Saskatchewan USports-M 28 4 22 26 0.929 0.4899 0.4789 2.7217 2.6607
2010-11 Univ. of Saskatchewan USports-M 28 8 15 23 0.821 0.4334 0.4038 2.4075 2.2432
2011-12 Univ. of Saskatchewan USports-M 28 16 17 33 1.179 0.6218 0.5472 3.4545 3.0401
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast SR 8 0 1 1 0.125
2011-12 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast JR 13 0 1 1 0.077
2010-11 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast SO 10 2 1 3 0.300
2009-10 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast FR 18 1 1 2 0.111
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.35
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.11
2009-10 · Plymouth State
-68.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#4748
Forward overall
#178
Forward born in 1986

D2/3 Comparables

Hamilton · 2001-02
1.400 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Utica · 2018-19
1.448 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2002-03
1.704 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.