IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kyle Ross Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1986-09-12 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2002-03 Red Deer Rebels WHL 9 0 3 3 0.333 0.1621 0.1809 0.8135 0.9080
2003-04 — WHL 67 2 16 18 0.269 0.1306 0.1394 0.6558 0.7002
2004-05 Regina Pats WHL 72 10 30 40 0.556 0.2701 0.2739 1.3561 1.3753
2005-06 Regina Pats WHL 69 25 31 56 0.812 0.3946 0.3817 1.9810 1.9162
2006-07 Regina Pats WHL 71 20 48 68 0.958 0.4656 0.4266 2.3376 2.1419
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 Plymouth State D3 — SR 8 0 1 1 0.125
2011-12 Plymouth State D3 — JR 13 0 1 1 0.077
2010-11 Plymouth State D3 — SO 10 2 1 3 0.300
2009-10 Plymouth State D3 — FR 18 1 1 2 0.111
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.35
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.11
2009-10 · Plymouth State
-68.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#5392
Forward overall
#220
Forward born in 1986
#448
in WHL

D1 Comparables

A.J. Reid
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.42 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jared VanWormer
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.27 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sean Gaffney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Beau Walker
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Sacred Heart (0.40 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brett Gravelle
St. Thomas · 2015-16
0.923 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Nolan Redler
UMass Boston · 2015-16
1.125 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Ellis
SUNY Oswego · 2003-04
1.704 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.