Zach Redmond Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1988-07-26 Country: USA

Set Commitment

School

Type

Date (optional)

Detected conference: () — projections will update automatically.

Notes (optional)

Projecting as:

Show:

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory

Dashed = raw PPG · ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG · ■ Green = actual college PPG

Junior Seasons

Season	Team	League	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG	NCAAe-PPG	Age-Adj	D3e-PPG	Age-Adj
2005-06	Sioux Falls Stampede	USHL	48	4	7	11	0.229	0.1409	0.1509	0.6753	0.7232
2006-07	Sioux Falls Stampede	USHL	60	8	31	39	0.650	0.3996	0.4074	1.9150	1.9524
2020-21	EHC München	DEL	37	8	25	33	0.892	0.9754	0.9754	—	—
2021-22	EHC München	DEL	50	16	25	41	0.820	0.8968	0.6674	—	—
2022-23	EHC München	DEL	53	9	29	38	0.717	0.7841	0.5605	—	—

■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor) ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor) COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Seasons (Historical)

Season	School	Div	Conference	Year	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG
2010-11	Ferris State	D1	—	SR	26	7	13	20	0.769
2009-10	Ferris State	D1	—	JR	40	6	21	27	0.675
2008-09	Ferris State	D1	—	SO	38	3	21	24	0.632
2007-08	Ferris State	D1	—	FR	37	6	13	19	0.513

Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year

Projected PPG

0.29

before college

→

Actual FR PPG

0.51

2007-08 · Ferris State

+78.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%

NCAA D1

NCAA D2/D3

90%

Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#351

Defenseman overall

#73

Defenseman born in 1988

D2/3 Comparables

Brycon Johnson

Bryn Athyn · 2014-15

0.778 Strong

actual D2/3 PPG

Justin Fox

Salem State · 2005-06

1.429 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

Logan DiScanio

New England · 2017-18

1.000 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.