IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Zach Redmond Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1988-07-26 Country: USA
2008 · Round 6, Pick #184  ·  Atlanta Thrashers
Signed Professionally
EHC München · DEL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2005-06 Sioux Falls Stampede USHL 48 4 7 11 0.229 0.1352 0.1448 0.6884 0.7372
2006-07 Sioux Falls Stampede USHL 60 8 31 39 0.650 0.3834 0.3909 1.9522 1.9903
2020-21 EHC München DEL 37 8 25 33 0.892 2.2298 2.2298 7.5617 7.5617
2021-22 EHC München DEL 50 16 25 41 0.820 2.0500 1.5257 6.9521 5.1739
2022-23 EHC München DEL 53 9 29 38 0.717 1.7925 1.2813 6.0789 4.3454
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2010-11 Ferris State D1 CCHA SR 26 7 13 20 0.769
2009-10 Ferris State D1 CCHA JR 40 6 21 27 0.675
2008-09 Ferris State D1 CCHA SO 38 3 21 24 0.632
2007-08 Ferris State D1 CCHA FR 37 6 13 19 0.513
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.28
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.51
2007-08 · Ferris State
+86.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 20 comparables)

🏒 NHL / Pro Track — production profile is consistent with players who bypassed or minimized college hockey
0%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
100%
NHL / Pro

NCAAe Rankings

#351
Defenseman overall
#73
Defenseman born in 1988

D2/3 Comparables

Neil Trimm
Neumann · 2003-04
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Arkhip Ledenkov
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Brandon Osmundson
Utica · 2018-19
1.448 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.