← New Search ↗ Social Card

Greg Beller Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1987-01-22 Country: Canada
2005 · Round 6, Pick #178  ·  New York Rangers New York Rangers
Signed Professionally
Univ. of Manitoba · USports-M

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2005-06 Green Bay Gamblers USHL 3 1 0 1 0.333 0.1966 0.1957 1.0010 0.9965
2007-08 Vernon Vipers BCHL 23 10 10 20 0.870 0.3351 0.3027 1.2655 1.1433
2008-09 Univ. of Manitoba USports-M 9 1 2 3 0.333 0.1758 0.1830 0.9769 1.0170
2009-10 Univ. of Manitoba USports-M 28 4 7 11 0.393 0.2073 0.2064 1.1516 1.1466
2010-11 Univ. of Manitoba USports-M 22 8 14 22 1.000 0.5276 0.5011 2.9310 2.7838
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2007-08 Yale D1 ECAC SO 2 0 0 0 0.000
2006-07 Yale D1 ECAC FR 24 2 3 5 0.208
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.21
2006-07 · Yale
+24.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#9703
Forward overall
#346
Forward born in 1987

D2/3 Comparables

Utica · 2016-17
1.038 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2023-24
0.826 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2004-05
1.704 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.