← New Search ↗ Social Card

T.J. Fast Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1987-09-02 Country: Canada
2005 · Round 2, Pick #60  ·  Los Angeles Kings Los Angeles Kings
Signed Professionally
Eispiraten Crimmitschau · DEL2

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2003-04 Calgary Royals AJHL 10 0 2 2 0.200 0.0671 0.0760 0.1851 0.2096
2004-05 Camrose Kodiaks AJHL 58 8 28 36 0.621 0.2082 0.2259 0.5744 0.6232
2006-07 Tri-City Americans WHL 26 3 19 22 0.846 0.4117 0.3972 2.0763 2.0034
2007-08 Tri-City Americans WHL 71 17 37 54 0.761 0.3700 0.3380 1.8663 1.7051
2013-14 Eispiraten Crimmitschau DEL2 49 9 25 34 0.694 0.9295 0.9702 1.2451 1.2996
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2006-07 Denver D1 NCHC SO 19 0 4 4 0.210
2005-06 Denver D1 NCHC FR 39 1 6 7 0.179
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.18
2005-06 · Denver
+14.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#2433
Defenseman overall
#426
Defenseman born in 1987

D2/3 Comparables

Nazareth · 2017-18
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
University of New England · 2017-18
1.654 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Adrian · 2016-17
1.357 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.