| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003-04 | Calgary Royals | AJHL | 10 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.200 | 0.0671 | 0.0760 | 0.1851 | 0.2096 |
| 2004-05 | Camrose Kodiaks | AJHL | 58 | 8 | 28 | 36 | 0.621 | 0.2082 | 0.2259 | 0.5744 | 0.6232 |
| 2006-07 | Tri-City Americans | WHL | 26 | 3 | 19 | 22 | 0.846 | 0.4117 | 0.3972 | 2.0763 | 2.0034 |
| 2007-08 | Tri-City Americans | WHL | 71 | 17 | 37 | 54 | 0.761 | 0.3700 | 0.3380 | 1.8663 | 1.7051 |
| 2013-14 | Eispiraten Crimmitschau | DEL2 | 49 | 9 | 25 | 34 | 0.694 | 0.9295 | 0.9702 | 1.2451 | 1.2996 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006-07 | Denver | D1 | NCHC | SO | 19 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.210 |
| 2005-06 | Denver | D1 | NCHC | FR | 39 | 1 | 6 | 7 | 0.179 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.