Kevin Smith Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1991-02-16 Country: Canada

Set Commitment

School

Type

Date (optional)

Detected conference: () — projections will update automatically.

Notes (optional)

Projecting as:

Show:

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory

Dashed = raw PPG · ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG · ■ Green = actual college PPG

Junior Seasons

Season	Team	League	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG	NCAAe-PPG	Age-Adj	D3e-PPG	Age-Adj
2006-07	Moose Jaw Warriors	WHL	4	0	0	0	0.000	—	—	—	—
2007-08	Moose Jaw Warriors	WHL	39	0	1	1	0.026	0.0125	0.0136	0.0626	0.0680
2008-09	Moose Jaw Warriors	WHL	56	2	16	18	0.321	0.1564	0.1622	0.7863	0.8154
2009-10	Moose Jaw Warriors	WHL	70	7	17	24	0.343	0.1668	0.1645	0.8389	0.8271
2010-11	Kelowna Rockets	WHL	72	5	23	28	0.389	0.1892	0.1777	0.9514	0.8934
2011-12	Kelowna Rockets	WHL	27	1	13	14	0.518	0.2523	0.2238	1.2685	1.1251
2012-13	Univ. of British Columbia	USports-M	21	2	7	9	0.429	0.2261	0.2386	1.2563	1.3258
2013-14	Univ. of British Columbia	USports-M	16	2	3	5	0.312	0.1649	0.1662	0.9160	0.9231

■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor) ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor) COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Seasons (Historical)

Season	School	Div	Conference	Year	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG
2013-14	Finlandia	D3	—	SR	23	3	5	8	0.348
2012-13	Finlandia	D3	—	JR	24	2	7	9	0.375
2011-12	Finlandia	D3	—	SO	25	2	6	8	0.320
2010-11	Finlandia	D3	—	FR	22	1	3	4	0.182

Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year

Projected PPG

0.15

before college

→

Actual FR PPG

0.18

2010-11 · Finlandia

+17.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#6245

Defenseman overall

#964

Defenseman born in 1991

D2/3 Comparables

Ryan McDonald

Framingham State · 2009-10

0.818 Strong

actual D2/3 PPG

Ryan Bloom

New England · 2015-16

1.654 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

Reid Bibb

Buffalo State · 2016-17

0.963 Strong

actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.