T.J. Galiardi Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1988-04-22 Country: USA

2007 · Round 2, Pick #55 ·

Colorado Avalanche

Set Commitment

School

Type

Date (optional)

Detected conference: () — projections will update automatically.

Notes (optional)

Projecting as:

Show:

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory

Dashed = raw PPG · ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG · ■ Green = actual college PPG

Junior Seasons

Season	Team	League	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG	NCAAe-PPG	Age-Adj	D3e-PPG	Age-Adj
2005-06	Calgary Royals	AJHL	56	19	37	56	1.000	0.3354	0.3587	0.9254	0.9896
2007-08	Calgary Hitmen	WHL	72	18	52	70	0.972	0.4730	0.4472	2.3855	2.2556
2015-16	Malmö Redhawks	SHL	29	3	12	15	0.517	1.2930	1.1835	6.7487	6.1774
2016-17	—	KHL	16	4	3	7	0.438	1.0938	1.0158	6.0282	5.5984
2017-18	Dinamo Riga	KHL	11	0	6	6	0.545	1.3638	1.2083	7.5163	6.6591

■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor) ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor) COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Seasons (Historical)

Season	School	Div	Conference	Year	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG
2006-07	Dartmouth	D1	ECAC	FR	33	14	17	31	0.939

Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year

Projected PPG

0.31

before college

→

Actual FR PPG

0.94

2006-07 · Dartmouth

+206.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 17 comparables)

🏒 NHL / Pro Track — production profile is consistent with players who bypassed or minimized college hockey

NCAA D1

NCAA D2/D3

100%

NHL / Pro

NCAAe Rankings

#825

Forward overall

#26

Forward born in 1988

D2/3 Comparables

Neil Trimm

Neumann · 2003-04

1.800 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

Arkhip Ledenkov

St. Scholastica · 2018-19

1.636 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

Brandon Osmundson

Utica · 2018-19

1.448 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.