| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004-05 | U.S. National U17 Team | NTDP-U18 | 54 | 16 | 18 | 34 | 0.630 | 0.4680 | 0.4958 | 2.3493 | 2.4889 |
| 2005-06 | U.S. National U18 Team | NTDP-U18 | 51 | 17 | 24 | 41 | 0.804 | 0.5975 | 0.6038 | 2.9997 | 3.0315 |
| 2007-08 | Seattle Thunderbirds | WHL | 70 | 21 | 34 | 55 | 0.786 | 0.3822 | 0.3761 | 1.9279 | 1.8973 |
| 2008-09 | Seattle Thunderbirds | WHL | 63 | 27 | 35 | 62 | 0.984 | 0.4788 | 0.4475 | 2.4147 | 2.2568 |
| 2014-15 | Metallurg Novokuznetsk | KHL | 22 | 2 | 10 | 12 | 0.545 | 1.3638 | 1.4682 | 7.5163 | 8.0914 |
| 2019-20 | Nürnberg Ice Tigers | DEL | 15 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0.133 | 0.3332 | 0.3332 | 1.1301 | 1.1301 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006-07 | Minnesota | D1 | BigTen | FR | 43 | 7 | 8 | 15 | 0.349 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.