| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005-06 | King Rebellion | OJHL | 48 | 34 | 34 | 68 | 1.417 | 0.4256 | 0.4081 | 0.9697 | 0.9298 |
| 2006-07 | Des Moines Buccaneers | USHL | 58 | 28 | 34 | 62 | 1.069 | 0.6571 | 0.6004 | 3.1495 | 2.8777 |
| 2012-13 | Södertälje SK | Allsvenskan | 20 | 6 | 18 | 24 | 1.200 | 3.0000 | 2.9037 | — | — |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-11 | Bemidji State | D1 | — | SR | 37 | 22 | 13 | 35 | 0.946 |
| 2009-10 | Bemidji State | D1 | — | JR | 37 | 19 | 22 | 41 | 1.108 |
| 2008-09 | Bemidji State | D1 | — | SO | 37 | 15 | 25 | 40 | 1.081 |
| 2007-08 | Bemidji State | D1 | — | FR | 36 | 9 | 18 | 27 | 0.750 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.