IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Pat Cannone Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1986-08-09 Country: USA
Signed Professionally
Schwenninger Wild Wings · DEL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2004-05 Springfield Jr. Pics EJHL 49 26 28 54 1.102 0.3265 0.3358 — —
2005-06 Springfield Jr. Pics EJHL 45 22 31 53 1.178 0.3490 0.3422 — —
2006-07 Cedar Rapids RoughRiders USHL 59 18 37 55 0.932 0.5499 0.5067 2.7998 2.5796
2018-19 ERC Ingolstadt DEL 52 8 30 38 0.731 1.8270 1.5083 6.1959 5.1151
2019-20 Schwenninger Wild Wings DEL 51 10 25 35 0.686 1.7158 1.7158 5.8186 5.8186
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2010-11 Miami D1 CCHA-orig SR 39 14 23 37 0.949
2009-10 Miami D1 NCHC JR 44 14 17 31 0.705
2008-09 Miami D1 NCHC SO 41 11 24 35 0.854
2007-08 Miami D1 NCHC FR 42 6 24 30 0.714
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.38
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.71
2007-08 · Miami
+89.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 20 comparables)

🏒 NHL / Pro Track — production profile is consistent with players who bypassed or minimized college hockey
0%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
100%
NHL / Pro

NCAAe Rankings

#2828
Forward overall
#96
Forward born in 1986

D2/3 Comparables

Neil Trimm
Neumann · 2003-04
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Arkhip Ledenkov
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Brandon Osmundson
Utica · 2018-19
1.448 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.