Pat Cannone Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1986-08-09 Country: USA

Set Commitment

School

Type

Date (optional)

Detected conference: () — projections will update automatically.

Notes (optional)

Projecting as:

Show:

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory

Dashed = raw PPG · ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG · ■ Green = actual college PPG

Junior Seasons

Season	Team	League	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG	NCAAe-PPG	Age-Adj	D3e-PPG	Age-Adj
2004-05	Springfield Jr. Pics	EJHL	49	26	28	54	1.102	0.3265	0.3358	—	—
2005-06	Springfield Jr. Pics	EJHL	45	22	31	53	1.178	0.3490	0.3422	—	—
2006-07	Cedar Rapids RoughRiders	USHL	59	18	37	55	0.932	0.5730	0.5279	2.7464	2.5304
2018-19	ERC Ingolstadt	DEL	52	8	30	38	0.731	0.7992	0.6598	—	—
2019-20	Schwenninger Wild Wings	DEL	51	10	25	35	0.686	0.7505	0.7505	—	—

■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor) ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor) COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Seasons (Historical)

Season	School	Div	Conference	Year	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG
2010-11	Miami	D1	CCHA-orig	SR	39	14	23	37	0.949
2009-10	Miami	D1	—	JR	44	14	17	31	0.705
2008-09	Miami	D1	—	SO	41	11	24	35	0.854
2007-08	Miami	D1	—	FR	42	6	24	30	0.714

Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year

Projected PPG

0.39

before college

→

Actual FR PPG

0.71

2007-08 · Miami

+84.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%

NCAA D1

NCAA D2/D3

88%

Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#2780

Forward overall

#93

Forward born in 1986

D2/3 Comparables

Rihards Marenis

Aurora · 2013-14

1.000 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

Zach Dill

Salem State · 2021-22

1.111 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

Lucas Signoretti

Buffalo State · 2023-24

1.120 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.