← New Search ↗ Social Card

Meredith Boettcher Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-10-27 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Duluth Marshall School (W) USHS-MN-W 25 4 4 8 0.320 0.0483 0.0483
2018-19 Duluth Marshall School (W) USHS-MN-W 25 11 4 15 0.600 0.0906 0.0906
2019-20 Duluth Marshall School (W) USHS-MN-W 23 6 11 17 0.739 0.1116 0.1116
2020-21 Duluth Marshall School (W) USHS-MN-W 19 17 22 39 2.053 0.3099 0.3099
2021-22 Duluth Marshall School (W) USHS-MN-W 24 13 21 34 1.417 0.2139 0.2139
2022-23 Duluth Marshall School (W) USHS-MN-W 28 20 15 35 1.250 0.1888 0.1678
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Nazareth D3 30 19 15 34 1.133
2024-25 Nazareth D3 7 4 3 7 1.000
2023-24 Nazareth D3 29 13 13 26 0.897
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.90
2023-24 · Nazareth
+462.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

0%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
100%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#3076
Forward overall
#129
Forward born in 2004
#377
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.12 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG
→ Minnesota (1.00 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG
→ Yale (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Average
NCAAe PPG
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Maine
0.16 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.20 PPG
→ UConn (1.00 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Elite
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ohio State ·
0.410 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Minnesota ·
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Yale ·
0.517 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.