Based on 40 comparable players
Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-W PPG | Age-Adjusted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-22 | Woodbury High (women) | USHS-MN-W | 26 | 8 | 6 | 14 | 0.538 | 0.0813 | 0.0813 |
| 2022-23 | Woodbury High (women) | USHS-MN-W | 26 | 9 | 6 | 15 | 0.577 | 0.0871 | 0.0881 |
| 2023-24 | Woodbury High (women) | USHS-MN-W | 27 | 11 | 8 | 19 | 0.704 | 0.1063 | 0.1031 |
| 2024-25 | Woodbury High (women) | USHS-MN-W | 27 | 16 | 13 | 29 | 1.074 | 0.1622 | 0.1510 |
| Season | School | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | Dubuque | NCHA | FR | 25 | 15 | 9 | 24 | 0.960 |
| Player | League · Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ivy Dynek | USHS-W · 2013-14 · 1.78 PPG | 0.000 | St. Cloud State |
| Katie Detert | USHS-W · 2012-13 · 1.80 PPG | 0.000 | St. Cloud State |
| Molly Strabley | NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG | 0.103 | Princeton |
| Annie Roche | USHS-W · 2012-13 · 1.88 PPG | 0.000 | Colgate |
| Grace Zumwinkle | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG | 1.000 | Minnesota |
| Player | Junior Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School | Conference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lily McKenzie | 2024-25 · 1.81 PPG | 0.210 | Wisconsin-River Falls | WIAC |
| Kayleigh Olson | 2024-25 · 2.08 PPG | 0.167 | Gustavus Adolphus | MIAC |
| Cara Cook | 2022-23 · 1.12 PPG | 0.333 | Aurora | NCHA |
| Rowyn Ringor | 2023-24 · 0.55 PPG | 0.667 | Post | CHA-W |
| McKenna Sandberg | 2022-23 · 1.23 PPG | 0.280 | Wisconsin-Eau Claire | WIAC |
Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.
NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.