icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-20 | Chisago Lakes High (W) | USHS-MN-W | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | — | — | — | — |
| 2020-21 | Chisago Lakes High (W) | USHS-MN-W | 20 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.050 | 0.0076 | 0.0076 | — | — |
| 2021-22 | Chisago Lakes High (W) | USHS-MN-W | 27 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 0.333 | 0.0503 | 0.0503 | — | — |
| 2022-23 | Chisago Lakes High (W) | USHS-MN-W | 27 | 16 | 14 | 30 | 1.111 | 0.1678 | 0.1587 | — | — |
| 2023-24 | Chisago Lakes High (W) | USHS-MN-W | 27 | 17 | 14 | 31 | 1.148 | 0.1734 | 0.1567 | — | — |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | Hamline | D3 | MIAC | — | 28 | 9 | 15 | 24 | 0.857 |
| 2024-25 | Hamline | D3 | MIAC | — | 25 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 0.280 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.