IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Shae Stinnett Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Hill-Murray School USHS-MN-W 25 4 10 14 0.560 0.0846 0.0846 — —
2020-21 Hill-Murray School USHS-MN-W 17 4 2 6 0.353 0.0533 0.0533 — —
2021-22 Hill-Murray School USHS-MN-W 28 9 14 23 0.821 0.1240 0.1240 — —
2022-23 Hill-Murray School USHS-MN-W 28 17 28 45 1.607 0.2427 0.2427 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Saint Benedict D3 — — 25 7 6 13 0.520
2023-24 Saint Benedict D3 — — 25 2 3 5 0.200
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.20
2023-24 · Saint Benedict
+19.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
88%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4774
Forward overall
#880
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Danielle Marmer
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Quinnipiac
0.24 No data
NCAAe PPG
Brooke Madsen
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.60 PPG
→ Penn State (0.60 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Lydia Passolt
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.60 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sophia Kunin
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.62 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Average
NCAAe PPG
Kiki Radke
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.58 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Danielle Marmer
Quinnipiac ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Brooke Madsen
Penn State ·
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Lydia Passolt
Bemidji State ·
0.095 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.