| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005-06 | Winnipeg Blues | MJHL | 57 | 22 | 28 | 50 | 0.877 | 0.2385 | 0.2664 | 0.5528 | 0.6174 |
| 2006-07 | Lincoln Stars | USHL | 32 | 16 | 20 | 36 | 1.125 | 0.6915 | 0.7251 | 3.3145 | 3.4758 |
| 2007-08 | Lincoln Stars | USHL | 54 | 37 | 32 | 69 | 1.278 | 0.7855 | 0.7835 | 3.7647 | 3.7550 |
| 2013-14 | — | Allsvenskan | 40 | 13 | 9 | 22 | 0.550 | 1.3750 | 1.4246 | — | — |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-11 | North Dakota | D1 | WCHA-orig | JR | 35 | 25 | 18 | 43 | 1.229 |
| 2009-10 | North Dakota | D1 | — | SO | 43 | 20 | 17 | 37 | 0.861 |
| 2008-09 | North Dakota | D1 | — | FR | 42 | 12 | 17 | 29 | 0.691 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.