IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Louise Gray Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-12-14 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Shattuck St. Mary's 16U USHS-W 45 3 5 3 0.067 0.0201 0.0201 — —
2020-21 Shattuck St. Mary's 16U USHS-W 31 4 9 13 0.419 0.1261 0.1261 — —
2021-22 Shattuck St. Mary's 16U USHS-W 49 14 22 36 0.735 0.2209 0.2209 — —
2023-24 Shattuck St. Mary's Prep USHS-W 56 5 17 22 0.393 0.1181 0.1181 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Colby D3 NESCAC — 26 3 8 11 0.423
2024-25 Colby D3 NESCAC — 26 4 8 12 0.462
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.46
2024-25 · Colby
+239.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
95%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5666
Forward overall
#235
Forward born in 2005
#1953
in USHS-W

D1 Comparables

Renee Saltness
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tianna Gunderson
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Janna Haeg
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.76 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Kendall Williamson
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.76 PPG
→ Colgate
0.11 No data
NCAAe PPG
Sofia Poinar
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.76 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Renee Saltness
Quinnipiac ·
0.029 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Tianna Gunderson
Minnesota ·
0.069 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Janna Haeg
St. Cloud State ·
0.303 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.