IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Gillian Evans Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-04-24 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Williamsville Federation USHS-W 22 0 2 2 0.091 0.0273 0.0273 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Alvernia D3 UCHC SR 23 0 6 6 0.261
2024-25 Alvernia D3 UCHC — 26 1 5 6 0.231
2023-24 Alvernia D3 UCHC — 26 2 3 5 0.192
2022-23 Alvernia D3 UCHC — 26 3 4 7 0.269
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.03
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.27
2022-23 · Alvernia
+942.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
88%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#7015
Defenseman overall
#664
Defenseman born in 2004
#4759
in USHS-W

D1 Comparables

McKenzie Sederberg
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.03 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Katarina Seper
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ RPI (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.03 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Katie Carlson
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT
0.03 No data
NCAAe PPG
Anna Erickson
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.13 PPG
→ Vermont (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.02 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Xylia Lang
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Lindenwood (0.09 D1 FR PPG)
0.03 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Leah Elledge
Lindenwood · 2012-13
0.032 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Logan Harper
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2014-15
0.292 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Kristen Kiggen
LIU · 2023-24
0.108 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.