IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Amanda Smythe Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-10-08 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 White Bear Lake High (women) USHS-MN-W 18 2 1 3 0.167 0.0252 0.0252 — —
2021-22 White Bear Lake High (women) USHS-MN-W 27 3 5 8 0.296 0.0447 0.0447 — —
2022-23 White Bear Lake High (women) USHS-MN-W 26 12 16 28 1.077 0.1626 0.1603 — —
2023-24 White Bear Lake High (women) USHS-MN-W 27 16 12 28 1.037 0.1566 0.1478 — —
2024-25 White Bear Lake High (women) USHS-MN-W 25 11 18 29 1.160 0.1752 0.1587 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 WIAC FR 19 1 1 2 0.105
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.11
2025-26 · Wisconsin-River Falls
-20.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
90%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4615
Forward overall
#194
Forward born in 2006
#834
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Sierra Semmel
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Maine
0.16 No data
NCAAe PPG
Grace Zumwinkle
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG
→ Minnesota (1.00 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Chancellor
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG
→ Yale (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Average
NCAAe PPG
Liz Schepers
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.12 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Carly Bullock
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.92 PPG
→ Princeton (0.81 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Elite
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Sierra Semmel
Maine ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Grace Zumwinkle
Minnesota ·
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Jordan Chancellor
Yale ·
0.517 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.