IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Grace Torma Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Centennial/SLP High (women) USHS-MN-W 19 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2019-20 Centennial/SLP High (women) USHS-MN-W 25 0 1 1 0.040 0.0060 0.0060 — —
2020-21 Centennial/SLP High (women) USHS-MN-W 13 0 2 2 0.154 0.0232 0.0232 — —
2021-22 Centennial/SLP High (women) USHS-MN-W 27 0 2 2 0.074 0.0112 0.0112 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 — — 26 1 1 2 0.077
2024-25 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 — — 27 1 1 2 0.074
2023-24 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 — — 28 1 2 3 0.107
2022-23 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 — — 26 2 2 4 0.154
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.01
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.15
2022-23 · Wisconsin-Stevens Point
+1352.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
95%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8088
Defenseman overall
#7832
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Paige Sorensen
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.09 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.01 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Hannah Schultz
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.12 PPG
→ Union (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.02 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Anna Erickson
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.13 PPG
→ Vermont (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.02 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Katarina Seper
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ RPI (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.02 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Caroline Buckholtz
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.04 PPG
→ Brown
0.02 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Paige Sorensen
Merrimack ·
0.529 Strong D
actual D2/3 PPG
Hannah Schultz
Union ·
0.267 Average D
actual D2/3 PPG
Anna Erickson
Vermont ·
0.030 Developing D
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.