← New Search ↗ Social Card

Alexandra Johnson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Winchendon NE-Prep-Girls 28 1 1 2 0.070 0.0434 0.0434
2018-19 Winchendon NE-Prep-Girls 29 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Dawson College Blues QCHL-W 26 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Dawson College Blues QCHL-W 0 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Dawson College Blues QCHL-W 21 1 0 1 0.048 0.0129 0.0129
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Aurora D3 NCHA 22 0 2 2 0.091
2024-25 Aurora D3 NCHA 27 2 6 8 0.296
2023-24 SUNY Cortland D3 7 1 0 1 0.143
2022-23 SUNY Cortland D3 7 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
92%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8889
Defenseman overall

D1 Comparables

USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.09 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.01 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.12 PPG
→ Union (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.02 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.13 PPG
→ Vermont (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.02 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ RPI (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.02 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.04 PPG
→ Brown
0.02 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Merrimack ·
0.529 Strong D
actual D2/3 PPG
Union ·
0.267 Average D
actual D2/3 PPG
Vermont ·
0.030 Developing D
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.