IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Paige Sorensen Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1997-05-13 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Wayzata High (W) USHS-MN-W 23 1 1 2 0.087 0.0140 0.0140 — —
2013-14 Wayzata High (W) USHS-MN-W 22 9 1 10 0.455 0.0730 0.0730 — —
2014-15 Wayzata High (W) USHS-MN-W 24 7 4 11 0.458 0.0736 0.0736 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Merrimack D1 — — 36 1 12 13 0.361
2017-18 Merrimack D1 — — 34 4 7 11 0.324
2016-17 Merrimack D1 — — 36 3 8 11 0.306
2015-16 Merrimack D1 — — 34 7 11 18 0.529
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.53
2015-16 · Merrimack
+663.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#4535
Defenseman overall
#320
Defenseman born in 1997
#3912
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Tristen Truax
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.07 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Jessica Adolfsson
SDHL · 2012-13 · 0.06 PPG
→ Penn State (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.07 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Jackson
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.44 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.07 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Kelsey Crow
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Penn State (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Abby Ecker
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.42 PPG
→ Bemidji State
0.07 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tristen Truax
Minnesota ·
0.167 Developing D
actual D2/3 PPG
Jessica Adolfsson
Penn State ·
0.343 Average D
actual D2/3 PPG
Jordan Jackson
Minnesota ·
0.130 Developing D
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.