IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Hannah Schultz Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1999-08-10 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Spring Lake Park (women) USHS-MN-W 24 1 2 3 0.125 0.0201 0.0201 — —
2013-14 Spring Lake Park (women) USHS-MN-W 25 6 4 10 0.400 0.0642 0.0642 — —
2014-15 Spring Lake Park (women) USHS-MN-W 25 7 1 8 0.320 0.0514 0.0514 — —
2015-16 SLP / Coon Rapids USHS-MN-W 25 16 25 41 1.640 0.2634 0.2634 — —
2016-17 SLP / Coon Rapids USHS-MN-W 25 20 10 30 1.200 0.1927 0.1927 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Union D1 ECAC-W SR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Union D1 ECAC-W JR 26 0 1 1 0.038
2018-19 Union D1 ECAC-W SO 16 1 0 1 0.062
2017-18 Union D1 ECAC-W FR 30 4 4 8 0.267
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.27
2017-18 · Union
+28.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#1110
Defenseman overall
#169
Defenseman born in 1999
#777
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Grace Bizal
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.16 PPG
→ Boston College (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Kate Hallett
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG
→ Harvard (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Katie Robinson
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Mekenzie Steffen
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.04 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Dani Sadek
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.46 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Grace Bizal
Boston College ·
0.268 Average D
actual D2/3 PPG
Kate Hallett
Harvard ·
0.100 Developing D
actual D2/3 PPG
Katie Robinson
Minnesota ·
0.129 Developing D
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.