← Women's Search ↗ Social Card

Emma Leahy Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2007-05-03 Country: USA
NCAA-W Projection
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I Women's

Projected PPG — WCHA-W
0.18
Developing (<0.25)
Base NCAAe-W PPG0.1894
Conf. Strength0.997
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencelow
Seasons Used1

NCAA D3W

Projected PPG — Division Avg
0.47
Average (0.35–0.65)
Base D3e-W PPG0.4987
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencelow
Seasons Used1

D1W / D3W Likelihood

12%
NCAA D1W
2%
NCAA D3W
85%
Club / Other

Based on 40 comparable players

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid = age-adjusted NCAAe-W PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG

Pre-College Seasons

Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).

SeasonTeamLeagueGP GAPtsPPG NCAAe-W PPGAge-Adjusted
2023-24 19U-AAA-W 13 2 4 6 0.462 0.1894 0.1894
2024-25 Berkshire NE-Prep-Girls 24 0 0 0 0.000 N/A N/A
NCAAe-W = points/game translated to NCAA-W equivalent  ·  COVID-flagged seasons in yellow

College Seasons

SeasonSchoolConferenceYear GPGAPtsPPG
2025-26 Connecticut College NESCAC FR 1 0 0 0 0.000

Historical Comparables — NCAA D1W

PlayerLeague · Season · PPG FR College PPGSchool
Kendra Nealey USHS-W · 2013-14 · 2.14 PPG 0.212 Cornell
Grace Bizal USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.35 PPG 0.268 Boston College
Dani Sadek USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.38 PPG 0.611 Ohio State
Kate Hallett USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG 0.100 Harvard
Katie Robinson USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG 0.129 Minnesota

Historical Comparables — NCAA D3W

PlayerJunior Season · PPG FR College PPGSchoolConference
Gracyn Knowles 2024-25 · 0.92 PPG 0.548 Wisconsin-River Falls WIAC
Greta Nundahl 2013-14 · 0.96 PPG 0.519 St. Scholastica NCHA
Ashley Kloncz 2012-13 · 1.04 PPG 0.480 Augsburg MIAC
Kaleigh Martinson 2012-13 · 0.84 PPG 0.593 Wisconsin-Superior WIAC
Kensie Malone 2015-16 · 0.83 PPG 0.600 Augsburg MIAC

Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.

NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.