← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jenna Timm Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-09-10 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Maple Grove High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 0 7 7 0.280 0.0423 0.0423
2018-19 Maple Grove High (W) USHS-MN-W 22 2 9 11 0.500 0.0755 0.0755
2019-20 Maple Grove High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 5 9 14 0.560 0.0846 0.0846
2020-21 Maple Grove High (W) USHS-MN-W 18 1 6 7 0.389 0.0587 0.0587
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Saint Benedict D3 SR 22 7 10 17 0.773
2023-24 Saint Benedict D3 JR 25 1 8 9 0.360
2022-23 Saint Benedict D3 SO 26 6 9 15 0.577
2021-22 Saint Benedict D3 FR 23 5 12 17 0.739
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.06
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.74
2021-22 · Saint Benedict
+1159.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
92%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#3798
Defenseman overall
#417
Defenseman born in 2002
#3111
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

SDHL · 2012-13 · 0.06 PPG
→ Penn State (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.07 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.49 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.57 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Penn State (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.07 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.54 PPG
→ Penn State (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Penn State ·
0.343 Average D
actual D2/3 PPG
Ohio State ·
0.486 Strong D
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Cloud State ·
0.571 Strong D
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.