IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kelsey Crow Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1996-10-27 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Minnetonka High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 4 8 12 0.480 0.0771 0.0771 — —
2012-13 Minnetonka High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 5 7 12 0.480 0.0771 0.0771 — —
2013-14 Minnetonka High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 5 16 21 0.840 0.1349 0.1349 — —
2014-15 Minnetonka High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 6 21 27 1.080 0.1734 0.1734 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Penn State D1 WCHA-W SR 35 1 15 16 0.457
2017-18 Penn State D1 WCHA-W JR 35 4 11 15 0.429
2016-17 Penn State D1 WCHA-W SO 26 3 5 8 0.308
2015-16 Penn State D1 WCHA-W FR 25 2 2 4 0.160
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.16
2015-16 · Penn State
+7.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#1775
Defenseman overall
#188
Defenseman born in 1996
#1341
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Kate Hallett
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG
→ Harvard (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Katie Robinson
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Mekenzie Steffen
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.04 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Grace Bizal
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.16 PPG
→ Boston College (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Kenzie Prater
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.83 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.43 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Kate Hallett
Harvard ·
0.100 Developing D
actual D2/3 PPG
Katie Robinson
Minnesota ·
0.129 Developing D
actual D2/3 PPG
Mekenzie Steffen
Wisconsin ·
0.350 Average D
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.